[Frameworks] Kodak 7212?

[Jean-Louis Seguin]

Roger,

Hey man, I know the difference between 7212 and 7272.

The question is: why aren't you using 7272  in the first place for your optical printing instead of 7212 ?

http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion/Products/Lab_And_Post_Production/Intermediate_Films/5242/tech5242.htm

Cheers,
Jean-Louis


On 2011-05-05, at 3:57 PM, Beebe,Roger W wrote:

> 72-twelve.  Here's the official notice from October:
> 
> http://motion.kodak.com/motion/uploadedFiles/PCN0090510_Q.pdf
> 
> FYI,
> RB
> 
> On May 5, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Jean-Louis Seguin wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 2011-05-05, at 1:00 PM, Beebe,Roger W wrote:
>> 
>>> Did anyone comment here on the discontinuation of Kodak 7212 (100T).  I know more than one filmmaker (Rob Todd, Tony Gault) has mentioned to me that they've used that in their JK optical printers.  Apparently Kodak announced its discontinuation in October, and they expect us to use 7213 (200T) instead.  I'm sure they're not thinking about people who want SLOWER stocks & for whom too little light isn't an issue, but this seems like a significant loss.  I know there was the recent thread on print stocks here, and those remain good options, but it's terrible to lose one more tool from the toolkit.
>>> 
>>> Anyway, for those who hadn't already heard, heads up.
>>> Roger
>> 
>> 
>> I remember using 7272 as a color intermediate print stock for 16mm . It looks like it's still in the Kodak catalog. 1200 ft rolls.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jean-Louis
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20110505/63b6db10/attachment.html