[Frameworks] MSNBC: "Report: 35mm film will be dead by 2015"

[Alex McCarron]

I would really like you to be right and for there still be a reason for
distributors to release new films as prints just to cater to poor, hot
countries like India and that it would somehow be more affordable for
theaters in those countries to deal with the current distribution system
rather than whatever is coming next with digital projectors. I have to
admit I don't know that much about theaters in the third world but I'm
still skeptical that the poor will keep a more expensive way of
distributing films alive.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Jay Hudson <jkh30003 at gmail.com> wrote:

> now you're being facetious.  The only way to do it is through air
> conditioning.
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Alex McCarron <alex.mccarron at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > What if you put them in a minifridge and cut a little hole in the door?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Jay Hudson <jkh30003 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> consumer grade projectors will be even less resistant to heat.  It
> >> gets very hot in India.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Alex McCarron <alex.mccarron at gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > That's a hell of a spin. Do they have the money to keep Kodak in
> >> > business?
> >> > I'd figure it would be more likely small theaters in India would be
> >> > snatching up nicer consumer grade projectors from Best Buy Bombay as
> >> > quality
> >> > improves and expectations for quality drops and a point of acceptable
> >> > mediocrity is reached which seems to be the trend for culture of the
> >> > future.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jay Hudson <jkh30003 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I can't tolerate any more of these reports.  They are generally based
> >> >> on first world arrogance.  Little theaters in India don't have to
> >> >> money to sufficiently cool digital projectors.   Here it is certainly
> >> >> the near future, but there is a wider world out there.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:22 AM, David Tetzlaff <djtet53 at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Citing somethine called "IHS Screen Digest Cinema Intelligence
> >> >> > Service"...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://tinyurl.com/6oz7gl4
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > FrameWorks mailing list
> >> >> > FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> >> >> > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> FrameWorks mailing list
> >> >> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> >> >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > FrameWorks mailing list
> >> > FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> >> > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FrameWorks mailing list
> >> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FrameWorks mailing list
> > FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20111116/a2cd0e86/attachment.html