[Frameworks] 16mm stills in LA

[Philippe Leonard]

Put your 16mm in the negative carrier of a photographic enlarger and mask
it as you like. Then you're ready to strike prints from it without any
digital intervention!
On Jan 3, 2012 1:20 PM, "Myron Ort" <zeno at sonic.net> wrote:

> agreed.
> unless fuzzy pictures work for you for some reason.
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
>
> > The Cinelarger and Duplikin are total pieces of junk. Don't waste
> > your time.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Myron Ort <zeno at sonic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.ebay.com/sch/?
> >> _nkw=cinelarger&clk_rvr_id=304125622581&mfe=search
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:02 AM, mariah garnett wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey guys
> >>> does anyone have any good solutions for making photographic prints
> >>> off 16mm film? I talked to fotokep about it and it's kinda pricey.
> >>> Any home-made solutions? like a loupe on the lens of a 35mm still
> >>> camera type of thing? trying to avoid both optical printing and
> >>> scanning digitally.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> FrameWorks mailing list
> >>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FrameWorks mailing list
> >> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> > _______________________________________________
> > FrameWorks mailing list
> > FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20120103/3dbc02b8/attachment.html