[Frameworks] 16mm reversal lab(s)?

[ev petrol]

thanks folks!

 
moiratierney.net
vimeo.com/moiratierney



________________________________
 From: Serge Levchin <lestimides at gmail.com>
To: ev petrol <epetrol2 at yahoo.com>; Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com> 
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2012 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 16mm reversal lab(s)?
 


surely old pac lab is still processing old tri-x?

as for the difference in the ASA ratng: that would be because B&W film is more sensitive to the blue part of the spectrum; expose it under tungsten light, and you've effectively reduced the sensitivity of your film, all other things being equal; to compensate for this you're asked to rate your film at 160 instead of 200, which would then compel you to open up your aperture about 1/3 of a stop.

regards
s




On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:04 PM, ev petrol <epetrol2 at yahoo.com> wrote:

hey folks!
>
>
>where are you using for your 16mm reversal these days? 
>
>got the address for yale from colorlab; kodak suggested somewhere in plattsburgh (?)
>
>
>exposed some tri-x at 200ASA (instead of the recommended 160ASA) under a halogen tungsten light ... thinking it'll probably be ok (?)
>why the difference in recommended exposures btw, anyone have an idea? (since there's no added filter suggested for tungsten ... I think?)
>
>
>cheers Moira
>
> 
>moiratierney.net
>vimeo.com/moiratierney
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>FrameWorks mailing list
>FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20120711/778ee993/attachment.html