[Frameworks] fast film

[Jason Halprin]

No 800 speed color neg film has been made by Kodak for some time. And, as was pointed out, Fuji stopped manufacturing all motion picture film. I second Nicky's sentiment - rate Vision3 500T at 1000 or even 2000, and then have it pushed a stop or two. Or, shoot it at 500, and just have the print/transfer brightened. It has a huge latitude and can handle it.

-Jason




________________________________
 From: Nicholas Hamlyn <nicky.hamlyn at talktalk.net>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com> 
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] fast film
 

Why don't you push the 500 a stop or two?

Nicky.



On 10 Mar 2013, at 09:42, J Vent wrote:

No - 500T is the fastest speed motion picture film made by Kodak at this time. Fuji has ceased production of motion picture film. Vision 3 500T is very forgiving it can easily be rated at 250 to give one stop of over exposure. What is your intent with a higher speed emulsion?
>
>
>JV
>
>
>
>
>"Black Metal relaxes me"
>
>
>Roy Griffin '13
>
>
>
>On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:54 PM, matthew brown <matthewfrancisbrown at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>>
>>
>>I have looked at both the Kodak and Fuji Websites and only see 500 speed film.
>>Is there anywhere I can get color negative faster than that anymore???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>thanks so much,
>>Matthew Brown
>>_______________________________________________
>>FrameWorks mailing list
>>FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
>FrameWorks mailing list
>FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20130310/8342227e/attachment.html>