[Frameworks] fast film

Lars Fuchs editor at klipper.tv
Thu Mar 14 09:42:21 UTC 2013


I wonder if anyone could clarify for me what exactly 'rating at 250' means
in this context. Does this mean metering as if the film was 250ASA, and
then doing all lab work the same, without pushing or pulling in anyway? Or
does it mean something else?

begging forgiveness for my ignorance,
LF


On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:42 PM, J Vent <jvent.subscriptions at gmail.com>wrote:

> Good Morning- According to Kodak they no longer make anything over Vision
> 3 500T asa rating and have not for some time now. Long gone are the days
> when Kodak would/could reformulate almost any of their stocks past or
> present for an extra fee.
>
> http://motion.kodak.com/motion/Products/Production/index.htm
>
> All of the stocks listed on the above link are available with the
> exception of Color Reversal 7285 which was removed from production in
> Dec/Jan.
>
> Since the vision 3 emulsion is so forgiving they rated it down from 800 to
> 500, this info from the Hollywood Kodak Student rep. The film can easily be
> re rated at 800 or 1000 asa, however beyond that there will be a noticeable
> increase in grain, particularly in the shadow areas. This emulsion holds
> its highlights exceedingly well but by rating it 2 or more stops over you
> will degrade the shadow or underexposed areas. This may not be an issue for
> your project, and certainly you can alter the result with lab work as
> suggested above. Vision 3 works especially well when rated down to 250, for
> a stop of overexposure, this technique provides superior results and is
> used exclusively on my Cinematography lab students projects. One light work
> prints come out nice with this technique.
>
> JV
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Raymond Rea <prodcoor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I do miss the brief time period when Kodak made 800T. I shot a roll on a
>> back porch with one 100W bare light bulb as illumination (existing light).
>> Not only did highlights expose well but I got some subtle detail in the
>> shadows (no change in contrast as with pushing).
>>
>> Ray
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
>>> From: Jason Halprin <jihalprin at yahoo.com>
>>>
>>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] fast film
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <1362933975.44852.YahooMailNeo at web122103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>>
>>> No 800 speed color neg film has been made by Kodak for some time. And,
>>> as was pointed out, Fuji stopped manufacturing all motion picture film. I
>>> second Nicky's sentiment - rate Vision3 500T at 1000 or even 2000, and then
>>> have it pushed a stop or two. Or, shoot it at 500, and just have the
>>> print/transfer brightened. It has a huge latitude and can handle it.
>>>
>>> -Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>  From: Nicholas Hamlyn <nicky.hamlyn at talktalk.net>
>>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 6:38 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] fast film
>>>
>>>
>>> Why don't you push the 500 a stop or two?
>>>
>>> Nicky.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 Mar 2013, at 09:42, J Vent wrote:
>>>
>>> No - 500T is the fastest speed motion picture film made by Kodak at this
>>> time. Fuji has ceased production of motion picture film. Vision 3 500T is
>>> very forgiving it can easily be rated at 250 to give one stop of over
>>> exposure. What is your intent with a higher speed emulsion?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >JV
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >"Black Metal relaxes me"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Roy Griffin '13
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:54 PM, matthew brown <
>>> matthewfrancisbrown at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>I have looked at both the Kodak and Fuji Websites and only see 500
>>> speed film.
>>> >>Is there anywhere I can get color negative faster than that anymore???
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>thanks so much,
>>> >>Matthew Brown
>>> >>_______________________________________________
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20130314/5ab2369b/attachment.html>


More information about the FrameWorks mailing list