[Frameworks] (no subject)

[re]

Ahh interesting. That example clarifies a little for me. I see how it applies to your criteria: "given a certain context of achievement, would indeed appear to be a failure, but in which . . tadaaa! . . the artist has moved beyond"

but not how it constitutes "a strange space occupied by a particular obsession" 

but i also see how that's just an example, and an astute one on Pip's part!

can you relink the video?



•______||______•

On Nov 26, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Bernard Roddy <roddybp at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks.  Pip once replied to a post with an example.  A student using a camcorder hits play when he intends to stop and stop when he intends to play.  Imagine that going on for some time.  The result would be an example of what I have in mind - impossible to take much credit for!  And yet . . it could be done "on purpose," too.
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:29 PM, r e <roeenney at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Bernard Roddy <roddybp at yahoo.com> wrote:
> given a certain context of achievement, would indeed appear to be a failure, but in which . . tadaaa! . . the artist has moved beyond any such wanna-be status into a strange space occupied by a particular obsession
> 
> Hi there,
>  
> Trying to follow your train of thought. Seems like the technique of film scratching might fall into the category of according to Hollywood, one should avoid scratching film, but because of particular obsessions, people do so. Paul Sharits, for one. And I would say his work expresses an impatience of sorts, and that the tactility of the scratches (even through visual perception) amplifies this immediacy.
>  
> Maybe its a start: http://www.bboptics.com/sound-strip-film-strip.html
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> .......
> 
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20131126/71511589/attachment.html>