[Frameworks] exposed but not fully

[Gawthrop, Rob]

Jeff Keen used to leave film shot but unprocessed for years and then shoot a
few more layers on top.  On some of his diary films you can see his daughter
Stella at various ages in the same sequence.

Rob


On 04/01/2014 08:37, "nicky.hamlyn at talktalk.net" <nicky.hamlyn at talktalk.net>
wrote:

> I have often left exposed film undeveloped for several weeks without any
> problems that I can see,
>
> Nicky.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Falmouth University

-----Original Message-----
> From: Katherine Bauer <kittylitterxox at gmail.com>
> To: frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
> Sent: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 7:28
> Subject: [Frameworks] exposed but not fully
>
>
>
> HI Frameworkers.
> I have a bit of a manic question. I have some rolls of color neg, fuji 400T
> mostly. That I shot 1 as I like to say, "layer", of images onto already, but
> they were shot 2 stops under because I was going to add other layers onto
> them. Well things have gotten rather crazy with other projects and stuff so
> even though it has already been several months, I wont be able to add the
> other "layers" of images for another month! I have been keeping them so far in
> a cold room. Just for my nerves I want to know if this footage is going to be
> totally fu#ked because it is taking me so long to get to finishing the rolls.
> Or will it just be a slight difference in contrast or something like that? Has
> anyone had experience where they have waited 6 months to finish a roll? I
> think I must have in the past but I can not really recall. So I pose the
> question to you all.
> Thanks!
> K
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing
> list
FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listi
> nfo/frameworks