[Frameworks] Bi-packing acetate in a Bolex

[Dominic Angerame]

I think its a big mistake to attempt. There does not seem to be room for
the thickness of the stock and the Bolex has no registration pin to keep
frames steady. I would not like to damage my Bolex through bi-paking.

Dominic

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Francisco Torres <fjtorrespr at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> try this book-
>
> Techniques of Special Effects of Cinematography By Raymond Fielding
>
> https://www.google.com.pr/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=isbn:1136055533
>
> the nypl used to have it.... years ago.
>
> it cites this article---
>
> *'' bipacking with a bolex'', American Cinematographer, March 1964,p.140
> Day,W. Percy*
>
> 2015-12-01 7:44 GMT-04:00 Chris G <spydir at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was wondering if it was especially idiotic to bi-pack two acetate-base
>> stocks (in this case both Kodak Hi-Con) in a Bolex for mattes while running
>> it slowly with an animation motor.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Chris
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20151202/81c52dd1/attachment.html>