[Frameworks] Millennium Film Workshop

Fri Oct 2 23:42:08 UTC 2015

You had already said more than plenty.

Your cryptic "poem" is such a distraction for a general listserv. Send
stuff like this to the intended party and leave the public out of it. It is
just embarrassing, and garners you no good will.

Elizabeth McMahon

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:26 PM, David Baker <dbaker1 at hvc.rr.com> wrote:

> Jay,
>
> Rare flowers that germinated in the dark
> in that moldy old  place
> will not come again.
> We will never be as free to play with all the potentialities
> of projected light as we were there then.
> Still it must go on.
>
> "Darkness  cannot drive out darkness,
> only light can do that."
>
> -Martin Luther KIng Jr.
>
> I will say no more on the subject.
>
> David
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Jay Hudson wrote:
>
> To Sasha,
>
> Your words are inappropriate, offensive, and abusive.  I will not tolerate
> it, and I demand that it stop.  If this type of conduct is against
> framework's terms of use, I ask Pip to remove Sasha from the list if this
> continues.  I have moved on and hold animosity towards no one.  There was
> no justification to bring me into it.
>
> To David,
>
> I think it is better to lower the tone on this because I think you are
> speaking from the heart and with good intentions.  It is better if you
> consider that the situation with the Millennium followed a very common and
> recognizable patterns in non-profits.  I made my decisions based on
> extensive research and speaking with non-profit experts, attorneys, and
> other professionals.  Every person that I spoke with was extremely direct
> and unambiguous in saying that there was a serious problem that had to be
> addressed immediately.  A few even said that there was no point in trying
> to correct it.  I did what I thought was best and responsible.
>
> Those of use working at MFW inherited a situation where the organization
> was more than $40K in debt with the landlord. Howard basically dropped out
> of sight when he got sick and I had to step in to put out fires with the
> landlord.   When the archive thing was going on, MFW was trying to
> negotiate a new lease.  We were being served with papers.  Almost
> everything in the way that MFW functioned was so dependent on one
> individual, that there were almost no established patterns to run things.
> Naturally when he was not doing so, things fall apart.  MFW was failing
> what is called the risk assessment test, where an organization can not
> function without a certain individual.  This is unhealthy to an
> organization, plus it makes it much more difficult to get funding.
>
> I prefer that this be the last of this thread of this communication.  What
> happened, happened.  These issues have no pertinence to today's events.
> There is no sense in unproductively dwelling on events that are
> unresolvable.  No one can be completely objective in this.
>
> It is much better to think about the current MFW for what it is.  Times
> and conditions have changed.  It will not be the old MFW, but I do think
> that it has an important role to play.  Additionally, I wish people
> wouldn't think so much about the MILLENNIUM, but more about what their own
> needs are as filmmakers and what gaps exist in today's current situation
> that MFW can fill.  I am optimistic about the current MFW and have nothing
> but full support and appreciation for those who are working hard or
> providing support.  I would hope that you and others who have negative
> opinions would reconsider, be open minded, and be involved.  If not, that's
> ok too, but I do not want to see every posting regarding MFW to be met with
> this kind of communication.
>
> Jay
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:02 PM, David Baker <dbaker1 at hvc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Jay,
>>
>> Because I, along with Margot Niederland  and Howard helped Lili White
>> to organize and move the vast archives to a safe warehouse
>> I know firsthand how perilous that moment was.
>> There was a porousness and scariness at Millennium then which I hope
>> never to encounter again.
>> It was like NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD
>> (Romero 1968 black and white version).
>> We had to work with the utmost speed and efficiency for fear
>> all would be lost in one scenario or another.
>> Again I will say it is my deeply considered opinion that had Lili not
>> initiated action
>> at the moment she did the fate of the archives would have been very
>> different.
>> There was no question amongst those working to preserve this material
>> of the stakes involved. We were simply not willing to leave it in your
>> hands.
>> Your relentless assassination of Howard's character was common knowledge.
>>
>> Because I spent time with Howard until his last month
>> I know the uncommon grace with which he worked with everyone connected to
>> the Millennium
>> after he was deposed
>> even when shut out of important channels of communication.
>> I know he was absolutely devoted to keeping the Millennium going.
>> I also know that he regarded you as I do as someone
>> who consistently hits below the belt.
>>
>> Criticism I have for the current organization pales
>> before that which I reserve for you.
>>
>> You will live in infamy in the annals of the Millennium Film Workshop.
>> You hit Howard when he was down (health crisis / in the hospital).
>> You took the Millennium from a righteous threadbare struggling cultural
>> organization
>> to an obscenely chaotic mess that accomplished nothing during your regime
>> but the humiliation of Howard
>> and the dissolution and loss of the space on Fourth Street.
>> It was you the full board finally had no choice but to remove (in ignomy).
>>
>> It pains me to be so blunt.
>> You must understand that morally I feel the need to push past
>> the complicated smoke screen of words you are so adept at conjuring
>> and testify as truthfully as I can to what I witnessed.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Jay Hudson wrote:
>>
>> According to New York State law, in a membership nonprofit, the board has
>> the right to add or remove board members at will, unless there is anything
>> in the bylaws or the corporate charter that states otherwise.  Even in that
>> case, if there is a justifiable reason, like proven embezzlement, or
>> something like that, the board probably could get rid of the offending
>> board member.  There is nothing wrong in the appointment of board members,
>> with members approval or not.
>>
>> According to MFW bylaws, the president can call for an election at any
>> time for a special purpose at their discretion.  Stephanie Wuertz could
>> have made that decision at time.  I am not criticizing her because of
>> Millennium's extenuating circumstances.  I also don't think that it is fair
>> nor appropriate to bag on George, Lili, or the rest of the current board
>> either.
>>
>> There has been a lot of stuff going on, but as far as I know, the board
>> is working on getting the bylaws together, etc., so that when the time
>> comes, the meeting will be able to go on smoothly.  I have trust in the
>> current board, and would prefer that they can have the space to do their
>> job.  If one has concerns, it is much better that they contact board
>> members personally, rather than through public forums.
>>
>> David Baker's criticisms about the movement to reform MFW was predicated
>> on "negating howard" and that there was no interest in the archive and
>> completely false and oversimplified.  MFW had been in decline for many
>> years.  The problems were not personal but structural.  The NYSCA grant
>> went from $30,000 to $12,000, to $8,000.  There were considerable debts to
>> the landlord, who were about to pull the plug.  NEA stopped funding MFW.
>>
>> When I spoke to the funders, they both said that MFW was suffering from
>> severe and obvious "founder's syndrome," where one individual dominates the
>> organization, and can not distinguish between their own affairs and the
>> affairs of the organization.  MFW was in danger of imminent collapse.  If
>> nobody had stepped in the following would have happened:  the landlord
>> would have pulled the plug, the archive would have been hastily sold, the
>> landlord would get that money, the equipment would have gathered by
>> vultures, etc. It was in the best interest of all parties that something
>> was done.
>>
>> Regarding the finances, all of that information should be available.  As
>> for myself, the "undocumented income", that Sasha describes totals $22K,
>> which includes 3K of debts from my works as a monitor, or 19K, basically
>> 10K a year.  I can document that I worked an average of 15, 16 hour days
>> for months on end, including thirty six hours clearing stuff from the
>> theater and putting it in a dumpster.  I worked my ass off well past the
>> point of exhaustion and payed and significant personal price for it.  If
>> anyone has a problem with that, tough shit.  I have no complaints about it,
>> nor any animosity towards anyone, but I am not going to take shit for it
>> either.
>>
>> I have been away from MFW for two years and have moved on.  As tough as
>> it was, it was a great experience for me.  I was thankful to have the
>> opportunity.  I also am supportive of the current board.  I think that
>> people should not think about how MFW was or how MFW should be, but how MFW
>> is, what MFW can do and what they themselves can do to contribute.  If
>> people want to be stuck on negative shit from the past, that is their
>> problem, not mine.  If people don't like the "now" MFW, they don't have to
>> participate.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Francisco Torres <fjtorrespr at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to bring something up may seem harsh to most people on this
>>> discussion- Why not close the place for good already? After all these years
>>> it seems like the only sensible thing to do. As of ''As if it was our
>>> last day'' it seems that day is long past for the MFW. Maybe it was the day
>>> they closed shop at 4th street. Only the journal will remain as testimony
>>> of its greatness. And our memories.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-09-30 12:26 GMT-04:00 David Baker <dbaker1 at hvc.rr.com>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Sasha,
>>>>
>>>> For all those who enter the orbit of this strange institution
>>>> there are endless irreconcilable ironies to untangle.
>>>>
>>>> There is considerable mystery in how Howard Guttenplan was able to
>>>> preside despotically for forty years
>>>> without adherence to any of the precepts set forth in the bylaws,
>>>> simultaneously acting single handedly as steward to a cultural milieu
>>>> of such importance
>>>> that MoMA would proffer eighty five thousand dollars
>>>> (a number I believe was low for the staggering trove therein)
>>>> to obtain the archives.
>>>>
>>>> Lili White as much as she may vex
>>>> (I have no appreciation for gender biased curation whatever the
>>>> rationale)
>>>> decisively stepped up to lead a tiny group of people in order to
>>>> preserve the
>>>> Millennium Film Workshop Archives at a moment of almost unimaginable
>>>> disorder and chaos.
>>>> Were she not to have acted with such forceful authority this treasure
>>>> could easily have
>>>> been made to disappear by an ensuing political regime determined to
>>>> negate Howard's
>>>> achievement.
>>>>
>>>> As ironies go, one of the greatest for me to negotiate
>>>> has been observing my mentor Ken Jacobs's recent involvement with the
>>>> Millennium,
>>>> serving as  great Oz behind
>>>> an obfuscating curtain in successive post-Howard "democratic" political
>>>> regimes
>>>> each of which eschewed and expunged the monthly open screenings
>>>> that were an entry portal of the most democratic kind.
>>>> The irony being that it was precisely the open screening format
>>>> that gave Ken his start as a maker.
>>>> Things blossom in that sort of environment that cannot occur elsewhere.
>>>> One Friday on Fourth Street I remember the rare paperback book
>>>> specialist and great single frame advance
>>>> practitioner Chris Eckhoff a.k.a. Mr. E speaking about the projection
>>>> screen, he asked
>>>> "What if residue from all the films that have ever been projected on
>>>> that screen
>>>> are still there in some way?".
>>>> Thereafter I treated that particular projection surface
>>>> as a secret sacred palimpsest.
>>>> When Millennium collapsed and the screen came down,
>>>> the ghosts were gone.
>>>> The place was useless to us.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cronyism and concomitant kickbacks do not make a cultural milieu of
>>>> consequence.
>>>>
>>>> Singular courage and passion of the intensity you demonstrate does!
>>>>
>>>> As artists it is our mandate to be fearless, to find a way, to make it
>>>> happen.
>>>>
>>>> As if it was our last day.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 30, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Sasha Janerus wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Dr. Walley. Thank you David.
>>>>
>>>> It is worth noting that MFW has kept this document off their website.
>>>> Strictly speaking you're right about the "President" thing, which I'd
>>>> forgotten about--but it's really a technicality, as the title doesn't bring
>>>> any special powers. George was not elected to this or any other position,
>>>> but was . As I recall it, after Howard stepped down, a member-consensus
>>>> decision was made to keep the director off the board, and to have the ED be
>>>> appointed by the board. All of which makes good sense, especially given
>>>> everything that had transpired during the latter phase of the Gutenplan
>>>> period, though this emergency measure should have been ratified by a timely
>>>> revision of the bylaws. So "President" here is just an honorific--same
>>>> term, different meaning--so that the board looks the way boards are
>>>> supposed to look.
>>>>
>>>> If only the board had acted the way a board's supposed to act.
>>>>
>>>> One other quibble, David: the verb: "to Gerrymander" implies that
>>>> elections are in fact taking place. The *mot juste* would have been
>>>> "to steal."
>>>>
>>>> ***
>>>>
>>>> George,
>>>>
>>>> I didn't receive your email as you didn't send one to me. Apparently
>>>> the fact that I don't agree with your failure to follow MFW's bylaws means
>>>> that I'm not to be counted a "Friend" of Millennium--or is it simply a
>>>> friend of yours? My partner, Stephanie Wuertz--who previously occupied your
>>>> office--did receive a copy but deleted it, wanting nothing to do with MFW
>>>> ever again. Another life you've touched. The email is, of course, also
>>>> posted on an orphan page on your site. How could I have missed that?
>>>>
>>>> Your texts are, needless to say, mendacious in the extreme. Millennium
>>>> didn't pack up shop because the MoMA money was late. Millennium sank
>>>> because you and PK were incapable of providing financial information to go
>>>> with the grant narratives I wrote for you. When you did finally massage the
>>>> books into order, I'm pretty sure it involved making some shit up, in
>>>> particular Jay Hudson's undocumented ATM withdrawals.
>>>>
>>>> Your claim to transparency is belied by the fact that nobody knows
>>>> what's going on at MFW and next to nobody cares, as well as by a prior
>>>> email from you instructing me 1) not to talk about MFW in public and 2) not
>>>> to share "confidential financial and other information without
>>>> authorization," namely PK's insane budget for FY2014. I should note that PK
>>>> had himself informed me that all MFW documents--minutes, books, etc.--were
>>>> available to anyone who wanted to see them. And why not?: it belongs to its
>>>> members and to the community, and not to you.
>>>>
>>>> If you'd like to have a discussion about Millennium's future, I'd
>>>> encourage you to do so in full view of your constituency, which I'm sure
>>>> you'll agree extends beyond present membership and self-selected "friends".
>>>> Here are some places to begin:
>>>>
>>>> Could you put text of MFW's present bylaws on your website--preferably
>>>> not on an orphaned page.
>>>>
>>>> How many active members does MFW presently have? How many of them do
>>>> you consider elligible to vote? How many lapsed members would you consider
>>>> eligible to vote upon renewal? According to what criteria?
>>>>
>>>> How much cash does MFW have on hand?
>>>>
>>>> What are its month-to-month expenses?
>>>>
>>>> What were its FY2014 net income and expenditures, exclusive of the MoMA
>>>> money?
>>>>
>>>> How much income did MFW receive from workshops and equipment rentals
>>>> FY14? How much profit on the same?
>>>>
>>>> Has the board passed any resolutions to compensate Peter Kingsbury? If
>>>> so, for how much?
>>>>
>>>> ON WHAT DATE, IN OCTOBER, IS A MEMBERS MEETING TO BE HELD?
>>>>
>>>> Finally, there is the question of "slander." I was careful to frame
>>>> certain statements speculatively, and in your last email to me you enjoined
>>>> me to "desist from broadcasting via Frameworks opinions and
>>>> speculation that are not based on facts." The present opacity of MFW
>>>> makes a necessity of speculation. I do, however, know these people. Lili,
>>>> for instance, attempted to program herself in a Millennium show at the New
>>>> School, with a $200 honorarium for a single film. Steph and I stepped in,
>>>> and those with conflicts of interest were replaced by Jen Reeves and Peter
>>>> Hutton, among others. Lili promptly one-upped herself by having her husband
>>>> build Millennium a website. MFW was stuck with unauthorized, recurring,
>>>> exorbitant paypal payments. The website Mark built was so shitty it had to
>>>> be replaced by the current shitty site.
>>>>
>>>> MFW has furnished me with many more interesting anecdotes. And I should
>>>> note I have been a model of restraint insofar as I have not contacted or
>>>> the NY arts press, regulatory bodies, or your prospective funders. That
>>>> stance is subject to revision.
>>>>
>>>> Yours in cinema
>>>>
>>>> Sasha Janerus
>>>>
>>>> PS I have a sneaking suspicion certain phrases in the trash you've been
>>>> sending out as "Outreach Coordinator" were derived, consciously or not,
>>>> from the grants and other fluff I wrote. It's the sort of vague,
>>>> pseudo-descriptive language that is meant to sound inspiring when the
>>>> situation is anything but.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:08 PM, David Baker <dbaker1 at hvc.rr.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Spencer,
>>>>>
>>>>> Your skill as an Outreach Coordinator is certainly evident.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean no disrespect in asking who designated you President of
>>>>> Millennium Film Workshop?
>>>>> As I read the bylaws (with which Howard Guttenplan was wrested
>>>>> from his long time role as Executive Director), it stipulates in
>>>>> Article I  #2,
>>>>> the President is to be voted on by the membership.
>>>>> I have no recollection of this election occurring in regards to you
>>>>> holding this office.
>>>>> Is it possible I missed this important event?
>>>>> Perhaps I am in some way mistaken.
>>>>> It is my understanding that the original bylaws are applicable
>>>>> until the membership chooses to ratify a new set of bylaws.
>>>>> Is this not the case?
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached are the original bylaws as they were sent to me by Jay
>>>>> Hudson on 9/21/11.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not think Sasha Janerus is alone in the perception that this
>>>>> venerable institution has been gerrymandered by a coterie of insiders
>>>>> bent on personal
>>>>> enrichment of one sort or another.
>>>>> This may in part explain the precipitous decline in Millennium's
>>>>> membership from last year's 89 to the current 40 active members
>>>>>
>>>>> (as I count them on this recent list,
>>>>> http://millenniumfilm.org/memberlist/ )
>>>>>
>>>>> I would very much appreciate a response from you here in this forum.
>>>>> Herein I also appreciate Jonathan Walley's caring constructive words
>>>>> as they pertain to this matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> David Baker
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 27, 2015, at 8:55 PM, George Spencer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi, fellow experimental film enthusiasts-
>>>>>
>>>>> The great institution of Millennium Film Workshop, which over 49 years
>>>>> has done much to support the development of artists cinema, has been under
>>>>> financial threat since 2011.  Our governing board, executive director, and
>>>>> volunteer staff have struggled in extremely difficult circumstances not
>>>>> only to maintain our workshops, screenings, film journal, and equipment
>>>>> access programs, but to restructure our governance and operations.
>>>>>
>>>>> THESE are the questions some of you are asking on FRAMEWORKS, and here
>>>>> is MFW's reply:
>>>>>
>>>>> *- Is there any foundation to the original **allegations** posted on
>>>>> 7/10/15?*
>>>>> NO.  Millennium’s finance and operations are transparent, with best
>>>>> practices internal controls. Its board wholly supports and appreciates the
>>>>> work of its Executive Director, Peter Kingsbury, who will step down on October
>>>>> 31. Accusations against a public service non-profit such as
>>>>> Millennium are a disservice to the experimental cinema community;  and slander
>>>>> against individuals is morally repugnant and a violation of the Frameworks
>>>>> terms of service.
>>>>>
>>>>> *- Is there a more objective account of what’s gone on at Millennium
>>>>> that we might be able to read and discuss?*
>>>>> A “status update” letter emailed by the board to our Members and
>>>>> Friends on 7/23/15 provides some perspective on recent developments.  It
>>>>> can be found at: millenniumfilm.org/boardupdate
>>>>>
>>>>> *- Is there anything we could do to improve things? To intervene? *
>>>>>
>>>>> YES, YOU CAN HELP IN MANY WAYS.
>>>>> 1. Become a member or supporting member via our web-site:
>>>>> millenniumfilm.org/membershipandsupport/
>>>>> 2. Join our email list at millenniumfilm.org to get news and program
>>>>> announcements.
>>>>> 3. Come to our screenings, currently being held at Spectacle Theater
>>>>> in Williamsburg Brooklyn.  See the schedule at:
>>>>> spectacletheater.com/millenium-film-workshop-at-spectacle/
>>>>> 4. Subscribe to the Millennium Film Journal at mfj-online.org
>>>>> <http://www.mfj-online.org/>
>>>>> 5. Attend our Members & Friends Informational Meeting on Wednesday
>>>>> 10/7 at 7:00 pm at Brooklyn Fireproof (119 Ingraham Street, Brooklyn,
>>>>> NY 11237 -two blocks from Morgan Ave stop on the “L” subway).  Learn about
>>>>> our organizational restructuring and plans for the future.  Contribute
>>>>> ideas and volunteer some time.
>>>>> 6. Finally, and most importantly, “Take a Turn for Millennium”.  Make
>>>>> a short term volunteer commitment (see
>>>>> <http://www.millenniumfilm.org/volunteer>millennium
>>>>> <http://millenniumfilm.org/takeaturn>film.org/volunteer).
>>>>> Millennium’s restructuring and transformation over the last few years has
>>>>> been difficult and frustrating work by a very small number of filmmakers
>>>>> who believe in its promise and potential.  We have made significant
>>>>> progress toward “the new Millennium”.  But to get there *we urgently
>>>>> need volunteers *to perform simple but necessary tasks in the next
>>>>> few months to sustain our screenings, workshops, film journal, and
>>>>> equipment access programs.
>>>>>
>>>>> *- What’s happening right now?*
>>>>>
>>>>> We are planning workshops, programs, and fundraising in celebration of
>>>>> Millennium50, our fiftieth year.  We are searching for a new Executive
>>>>> Director.  We are working with our lawyers to finish our new Bylaws, which
>>>>> will improve Millennium’s governance and support, and enhance member
>>>>> participation.  After their approval by members, we will hold elections for
>>>>> our new expanded governing board.  In preparation for elections, we are
>>>>> defining the diverse knowledge, skills, and experience we will need on our
>>>>> new board, and our expectations for candidates.  We will ask members and
>>>>> friends for candidate recommendations, and ask people to serve.  Finally,
>>>>> we are asking people to volunteer, to “Take a Turn for Millennium” (see
>>>>> <http://www.millenniumfilm.org/volunteer>millenniumfilm.org/
>>>>> <http://millenniumfilm.org/takeaturn>volunteer).
>>>>>
>>>>> This email list serves parties interested in the cinema art.  Please
>>>>> join, volunteer, or otherwise show your support for Millennium, an
>>>>> organization that has effectively supported that art for nearly a half
>>>>> century.  Encourage others to become involved.  You will be revitalized by
>>>>> personal interchange with others of like mind, and your own cinema
>>>>> practice will be supported by becoming part of our community.  MFW
>>>>> continues to be a place where the passion and expression of
>>>>> hands-on, personal cinema, is studied, nurtured, and celebrated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> George Spencer,
>>>>> President, Millennium Film Workshop
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>

-- 
Elizabeth
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20151002/2689e4e5/attachment.html>