[Frameworks] 16mm sound recording

Francisco Torres fjtorrespr at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 19:44:05 UTC 2016


which reminds me- in the 80s kodak tried to use the whole base area to
record mag digital sound and get rid of optical sound.... did not get
anywhere.

2016-12-13 15:34 GMT-04:00 Jeff Kreines <jeffkreines at gmail.com>:

> Mag stripe is dead.  Not worth considering for a new film.
>
> DTS is overkill.
>
> Do you need a 16mm print with optical sound, in these days of digital
> (which has better sound)?  35mm blowups are not cheap.
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Morgan Hoyle-Combs <mhoylecombs at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> So, just so I'm caught up in this discussion, is it possible to stick a
> thin strip of magnetic sound tape to the celluloid or must it be done
> optically nowadays? Because it seems like there's talk of DTS with 35mm but
> I'm not aware of whether or not it can go on 16mm. Does that mean I'd have
> to consider a 35mm print of the 16mm?
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 2:27 PM, Scott Dorsey <kludge at panix.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> > They could just stick a magnet on the inching knob and use a reed
> switch..
>
> These solutions are good until the print is damaged and a frame has to be
> removed from it.
> --scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20161213/a49921e5/attachment.html>


More information about the FrameWorks mailing list