[Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302

[Amanda Thomson]

Thanks for this.

I am planning to use the stock to make a print, so with everything else
being the same I think I'll stick with 3302 with its polyester base.

So if polyester stocks are stronger, why do Kodak and ORWO make print
stocks with acetate base?

(I have run different estar stocks through my bolex and haven't had a jam.
I'm not sure it will deter me but, it's good to understand the risks when
taking them.)


Amanda


---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dominic Angerame <dominic.angerame at gmail.com>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 08:26:49 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302
> Note that running estar base film stock could badly damage your camera if
> there is a jam. I believe the pitch on the estar may be different than the
> acetate. I have shot acetate high con thru my bolex and once in a while the
> camera will jam because of the pitch difference. The people I know who have
> used 7302 have not had many problems with jamming. I would be wary of the
> estar based product.
>
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Scott Dorsey <kludge at panix.com> wrote:
>
>> There is no difference other than the base, but you have to be pretty
>> adventurous to run polyester film in a camera.
>>
>> The polyester base is WAY more rugged and for release prints you
>> definitely
>> want the polyester material.
>>
>> --scott
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Scott Dorsey <kludge at panix.com>
> To: frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:29:16 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] 7302 vs 3302
> The pitch on 7302 and 3302 are both long pitch, which is another reason
> they can cause real problems in a cine camera.  They are both intended
> for the same printing applications but as I said the estar base will give
> you a much more rugged print.
> --scott
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20170815/ee95ddba/attachment.html>