[Frameworks] Editing negative

[Esperanza Collado]

Yes, that could be a problem. I actually have a workprint, so I could
perfectly work that way and avoid altering/dusting the negative.

Cheers


2017-10-23 4:42 GMT+02:00 Fred Camper <f at fredcamper.com>:

>
> On 10/22/2017 8:46 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote:
>
> We did “cull” our original (usually reversal, back in the day) before wo
> rkprinting, to save every last penny.
>
> As did big-budget Hollywood films -- that was the difference between the
> director ending a take with a call of “cut,“ or “cut print.“
>
> Cutting from workprint is a wonderful luxury. You can actually try out
> different things, and different shot lengths, without damaging the original.
>
> I agree about conforming and dust. Dust is a problem with reversal too,
> but when cutting negative it is much worse -- a black speck against a
> bright field is annoying, but it does remind one of the material nature of
> celluloid. A white speck against dark, which happens all too often with
> negative, what is that about? A lot more noticeable than a black speck, and
> actually a little too revealing of the process, if you ask me...
>
> Fred Camper
> Chicago
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>


-- 
Esperanza Collado
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
www.esperanzacollado.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20171023/be370206/attachment.html>