[Frameworks] Gamestop Kodak?

[graemehogg at irational.org]

Hi all. As its a numbers game perhaps we should start with some.

Pip, how many single subscribers to FW are there?

If each subscriber could also 'rally' a set of friends/contacts to bolster 
numbers it might be a good excercise.

We could tap the FilmLabs list and the Kino Climates ones also, as well as 
any other lists people know off....

So I am 1 subscriber. I think I could rally between 4 and 10 others.

Hard to put fiscal numbers on it, but we could be talking between $100 - 
several hundred each person.











































||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NACHLEBEN FILM LAB AND ARCHIVE
http://www.nachleben.org.uk
CUBE CINEMA. BRISTOL
http://www.cubecinema.com/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, FrameWorks Admin wrote:

> Hi Mike,
> There is already an article about this from yesterday, because the price of Kodak shares jumped from $9 to $14 yesterday
> before sliding down to $12 where it is now.
> https://investorplace.com/2021/01/kodk-stock-11-things-to-know-about-kodak-today-as-shares-continue-to-climb/
> 9 million shares changed hands yesterday, so we would need $108 million between us experimental filmmakers to make a
> difference. Any chance we can rally a buy?
> The next annual Kodak stock shareholders meeting will take place on or around May 20. 
> Pip
> 
>
>       On Jan 28, 2021, at 5:32 PM, Mike Morris <m_alex_morris at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Has anyone previously proposed filmmakers invested in celluloid filmmaking collectively purchase Kodak stock so that a
> voting block could be formed to vote to have the company prioritize film production? I don't actually know if this is
> possible or if there are enough of us to pull something like that off, but maybe there is someone here who knows a bit
> more about how stocks work that could provide some insight? I've held a small amount of Kodak stock in my (meager)
> retirement fund for a little while, and have wondered what involvement in the company this might look like.
> 
> 
> 
>