[Frameworks] bolex rewind/2x exposure Q

[Anna Kipervaser]

Hey Jimmy,

Reminding that much film is always a bitch and can cause problems. You
could, instead, shoot the whole roll and then rewind it on rewinds in the
dark, reload and shoot the whole roll!

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, 1:01 PM <frameworks-request at film-gallery.org> wrote:

> Send Frameworks mailing list submissions to
>         frameworks at film-gallery.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         frameworks-request at film-gallery.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         frameworks-owner at film-gallery.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Frameworks digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. bolex rewind/2x exposure Q (jimmyschaus1)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: jimmyschaus1 <jimmyschaus at gmail.com>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at film-gallery.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:07:58 +0200
> Subject: [Frameworks] bolex rewind/2x exposure Q
> Hi all,
>
> I'm shooting some 16 with a Bolex this weekend, and plan to do multiple
> exposures over the entire roll.
>
> For those of you with experience doing this, what's a good point on the
> footage counter to do the rewind, to take advantage of using most of the
> roll while still keeping it engaged in the camera and not accidentally
> finishing it?  I was thinking 95?  97?
>
> thanks,
> Jimmy
> --
> Frameworks mailing list
> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://film-gallery.org/pipermail/frameworks_film-gallery.org/attachments/20210625/3fe5d20a/attachment.htm>