[Frameworks] bolex rewind/2x exposure Q

[Karl Reinsalu]

No darkroom needed if you do the rewind in camera as suggested.
K.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 1:26 PM jimmyschaus1 <jimmyschaus at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey thanks for the suggestion!  That would be great but I don't think I
> have access to a darkroom with rewinds.  Indeed, come to think of it, I
> have fucked up a roll of film doing it "my way" before.
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:07 PM Anna Kipervaser <anna.kipervaser at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Jimmy,
>>
>> Reminding that much film is always a bitch and can cause problems. You
>> could, instead, shoot the whole roll and then rewind it on rewinds in the
>> dark, reload and shoot the whole roll!
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, 1:01 PM <frameworks-request at film-gallery.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Send Frameworks mailing list submissions to
>>>         frameworks at film-gallery.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>
>>> http://film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>         frameworks-request at film-gallery.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>         frameworks-owner at film-gallery.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Frameworks digest..."
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>    1. bolex rewind/2x exposure Q (jimmyschaus1)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: jimmyschaus1 <jimmyschaus at gmail.com>
>>> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at film-gallery.org>
>>> Cc:
>>> Bcc:
>>> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:07:58 +0200
>>> Subject: [Frameworks] bolex rewind/2x exposure Q
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm shooting some 16 with a Bolex this weekend, and plan to do multiple
>>> exposures over the entire roll.
>>>
>>> For those of you with experience doing this, what's a good point on the
>>> footage counter to do the rewind, to take advantage of using most of the
>>> roll while still keeping it engaged in the camera and not accidentally
>>> finishing it?  I was thinking 95?  97?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Jimmy
>>> --
>>> Frameworks mailing list
>>> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
>>>
>>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>>>
>> --
>> Frameworks mailing list
>> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>>
> --
> Frameworks mailing list
> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>


-- 
--
Karl Reinsalu
e.mail: KReinsalu at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://film-gallery.org/pipermail/frameworks_film-gallery.org/attachments/20210625/0d002754/attachment.html>