[Frameworks] Sharits question

[Albert Alcoz]

Hello Jonathan,

I have that Film Culture issue. The installation is not *Shutter Interface*,
is *SYNCHRONOUSOUNDTRACKKS*. This is the text:

"I guess I underestimated the total possible variational relations of each
frame of screen image A to B to C and B to A to C and C to B to A : i.e., I
guessed at one month (I do believe that one month is the extent of possible
human interest in the permutations but what is actually possible is, unless
my math is off, 7,784,722 days 5 hours). See Xerox of figuring
AxBxC's frames.
Much Cheer, Paul."

Best,
Albert

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 8:05 PM Eric Theise <erictheise at gmail.com> wrote:

> IIf no one delivers by Monday, Jonathan, I'll be able to.
>
> Eric
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:44 AM Dominic Angerame <
> dominic.angerame at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do you have the issue number. I have almost an entire collection of Film
>> Culture, that I plan on selling someday. Let me know the issue # and I
>> probably have it.
>>
>> Dominic
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2023, at 10:39 AM, Jonathan Walley <walleyj at denison.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Frameworkers,
>>
>> This might be a lot to ask, but here goes. I’m trying to hunt down a
>> factoid, which, while a mere jot of information, would be a big help to me
>> as I finish an article with a deadline looming. I have catastrophically
>> misplaced my beloved copy of the Paul Sharits issue of *Film Culture*
>> (1978, 65-66), which contains the treasure. In “Paul Sharits and the
>> Critique of Illusionism: An Introduction,” Annette Michelson makes
>> reference to Sharits’ calculation of how long it would take for one of his
>> installations (I believe *Shutter Interface*) to run through every
>> possible permutation of frame relations - that is, given the number of
>> frames on each of the four reels running in loops, and the fact that the
>> four projectors are not actually running in perfect sync (and the loops are
>> not all the exact number of frames in length), how long would it take for
>> every possible four-frame combination to be projected, thus effectively
>> “ending” the piece (see attached image for clarification, I hope).
>>
>> To make this even trickier, the reference might be in a footnote.
>> Michelson refers to a letter from Sharits that does the math, and comes to
>> the conclusion that the piece could, theoretically, run for some massive
>> amount of time like millions of years or something.
>>
>> If there are no takers on this little research project, I completely
>> understand. But if anyone has the *Film Culture* issue handy and feels
>> like skimming it for me, I’d be forever in your debt. BTW, I cannot find a
>> copy of the Michelson article anywhere online. I know it also appears in a
>> catalog for *Projected Images* (Walker Art Centre, 1974), but I can’t
>> find that online either.
>>
>> Like I said, it’s a factoid, but it’s a key for me to unlock some other,
>> bigger point, hence my mania to find it.
>>
>> Thank you everyone,
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <11A_FRI_Paul-Shartis-–-Shutter-Interface-1975-Achim-Hatzius-P4-600x400.jpg>
>>
>>
>> Dr. Jonathan Walley
>> Associate Professor and Chair
>> Department of Cinema
>> Denison University
>> https://denison.edu/people/jonathan-walley
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Frameworks mailing list
>> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>>
>>
>> --
>> Frameworks mailing list
>> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>>
> --
> Frameworks mailing list
> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>


-- 
http://albertalcoz.com/ <http://www.albertalcoz.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://film-gallery.org/pipermail/frameworks_film-gallery.org/attachments/20230129/00807085/attachment.htm>