[Frameworks] MItchell Cameras converting to one perf

Jay Hudson jkh30003 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 10 07:51:21 CDT 2010


16mm

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Tom B Whiteside <tom.whiteside at duke.edu>wrote:

>
> 35mm or 16mm? If it's 35 all stocks are double perf, right?
>
>
>
>
>  *Jay Hudson <jkh30003 at gmail.com>*
> Sent by: frameworks-bounces at jonasmekasfilms.com
>
> 06/10/2010 12:25 AM
> Please respond to
> Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
>
>   To
> frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> cc
>  Subject
> [Frameworks] MItchell Cameras converting to one perf
>
>
>
>
> The claw on the Mitchel camera is basically two long prongs on each side.
>  Obviously that means that you have to use double perf stock.  What would
> happen if you filed off one of the prongs so that you could use single perf?
>  would the image still be steady?
> _______________________________________________
>
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20100610/6f94b00c/attachment.html 


More information about the FrameWorks mailing list