[Frameworks] is sending film through USPS OK?

Thu Nov 1 12:35:02 CDT 2012

I sent colour neg to Alpha Cine in Seattle from the UK for dev and print and it was fine, completely unaffected as far as I can tell,

Nicky.

On 1 Nov 2012, at 17:25, katherine Bauer wrote:

> If I send film through the US Postal System will it be x-rayed? is x-raying film really that bad for it? Doesn't it depend on the speed of the film. If it is a low speed like 100 or 6 (hi-con) will it really affect it!!? 
> thanks 
> xo
> Kitty
> 
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:02 PM, <frameworks-request at jonasmekasfilms.com> wrote:
> Send FrameWorks mailing list submissions to
>         frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         frameworks-request at jonasmekasfilms.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         frameworks-owner at jonasmekasfilms.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of FrameWorks digest..."
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Make way for Lucas (hinterland.movies)
>    2. Re: Make way for Lucas (Adam Hyman)
>    3. Re: Lighting Gel (Scott Dorsey)
>    4. Millennium Film Journal (MIllennium Film Journal)
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "hinterland.movies" <hinterland.movies at gmail.com>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
> Cc: 
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:43:14 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Make way for Lucas
> Thanks! Glad to be erong about that
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> Michael Betancourt
> 
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Warren Cockerham <warrencockerham at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> He does put a portion into preservation work. Check the Frameworks archive for this conversation about a year ago. 
>> 
>> Warren
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Michael Betancourt <hinterland.movies at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Imagine if he put even a tiny part of his fortune towards preservation work...
>>> 
>>> (but don't hold your breath)
>>> 
>>> Michael Betancourt
>>> Savannah, GA USA
>>> 
>>> 
>>> michaelbetancourt.com
>>> twitter.com/cinegraphic | vimeo.com/cinegraphic
>>> www.cinegraphic.net | the avant-garde film & video blog
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Chuck Kleinhans <chuckkle at northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>> Announcing his sale of his Lucasfilm studio to Disney Corp and official retirement, George Lucas announced his return to making "experimental films."
>>> 
>>> His estimated net worth: US $4.1 billion.  No Kick-starter campaigns for George.  
>>> 
>>> Welcome back George!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Chuck Kleinhans
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Adam Hyman <adam at lafilmforum.org>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
> Cc: 
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:54:35 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Make way for Lucas
> But next year he’ll be increasing that contribution from $100,000 to $100,000,000
> 
> 
> On 10/31/12 10:43 AM, "hinterland.movies" <hinterland.movies at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks! Glad to be erong about that
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> Michael Betancourt
> 
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Warren Cockerham <warrencockerham at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> He does put a portion into preservation work. Check the Frameworks archive for this conversation about a year ago. 
> 
> Warren
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Michael Betancourt <hinterland.movies at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Imagine if he put even a tiny part of his fortune towards preservation work...
> 
> (but don't hold your breath)
> 
> Michael Betancourt
> Savannah, GA USA
> 
> 
> michaelbetancourt.com <http://michaelbetancourt.com> 
> twitter.com/cinegraphic <http://twitter.com/cinegraphic>  | vimeo.com/cinegraphic <http://vimeo.com/cinegraphic> 
> www.cinegraphic.net <http://www.cinegraphic.net>  | the avant-garde film & video blog
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Chuck Kleinhans <chuckkle at northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Announcing his sale of his Lucasfilm studio to Disney Corp and official retirement, George Lucas announced his return to making "experimental films."
> 
> His estimated net worth: US $4.1 billion.  No Kick-starter campaigns for George.  
> 
> Welcome back George!
> 
> 
> 
> Chuck Kleinhans
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Scott Dorsey <kludge at panix.com>
> To: frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> Cc: 
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:04:45 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Lighting Gel
> An 80B filter will take a 3200K lamp and give you about 6000K light,
> which will mostly match daylight sort of most of the time.
> 
> It is easier and cheaper to put a filter on the lens rather than gel
> all the lights, if you don't have any daylight sources in the shot
> that have to be matched to the lights.
> 
> It's easier just to use tungsten film most of the time since you don't
> take the light loss through the filter.
> --scott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: MIllennium Film Journal <mfj at mfj-online.org>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
> Cc: 
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:10:24 -0400
> Subject: [Frameworks] Millennium Film Journal
> For our subscribers who have been expecting their copy of MFJ 56: 
> 
> Our offices in Chelsea New York are without electricity and the local post office is closed. But the journals have arrived and are safe and dry in boxes in the studio. We expect to get the shipment out next week. 
> 
> Sorry for the delay! 
> 
> Grahame Weinbren
> Senior Editor
> Millennium Film Journal
> http://mfj-online.org
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://katherineannebauer.blogspot.com 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20121101/9c7f2967/attachment.html 