[Frameworks] Bi-packing acetate in a Bolex

[franco base]

Hi.
As Francisco, I'd like to read:
*Bipacking with a Bolex - American Cinematographer, March 1964,p.140 Day,W.
Percy*

Anyone from Usa can share this article?
Thanks a lot

2015-12-04 10:41 GMT+01:00 <nicky.hamlyn at talktalk.net>:

> I have done a fair amount of bi-packing acetate neg with polyester print
> stock, and polyester with polyester, and it works fine. Occasionally a
> frame slips, maybe every 500or 600 feet, but it works well and there's been
> no damage to the camera that I can detect,
>
> Nicky.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francisco Torres <fjtorrespr at gmail.com>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at jonasmekasfilms.com>
> Sent: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:45
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Bi-packing acetate in a Bolex
>
> maybe some one in the US  could go to a library and check this out -
> *Bipacking with a Bolex - American Cinematographer, March 1964,p.140
> Day,W. Percy*
>
> 2015-12-03 9:03 GMT-04:00 Chris G <spydir at gmail.com>:
>
>> I've seen pieces that were shot bi-packed in a Bolex using camera stocks.
>> I've shot a fair amount of acetate stock in camera, both single frame and
>> continuous without issue. I guess I'll have to do dummy load tests with
>> acetate-polyester then acetate-acetate.
>>
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 08:30, Bernd Lützeler <filmi at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> I have heard of this idea, using the Bolex as a contact printer. Not with
>> these particular stocks. Rather like a rumor...
>>
>> Bernd.
>>
>>
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Dominic Angerame <
>> dominic.angerame at gmail.com>:
>>
>> I think its a big mistake to attempt. There does not seem to be room for
>> the thickness of the stock and the Bolex has no registration pin to keep
>> frames steady. I would not like to damage my Bolex through bi-paking.
>>
>> Dominic
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Francisco Torres <fjtorrespr at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> try this book-
>>>
>>> Techniques of Special Effects of Cinematography By Raymond Fielding
>>>
>>> https://www.google.com.pr/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=isbn:1136055533
>>>
>>> the nypl used to have it.... years ago.
>>>
>>> it cites this article---
>>>
>>> *'' bipacking with a bolex'', American Cinematographer, March 1964,p.140
>>> Day,W. Percy*
>>>
>>> 2015-12-01 7:44 GMT-04:00 Chris G <spydir at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if it was especially idiotic to bi-pack two
>>>> acetate-base stocks (in this case both Kodak Hi-Con) in a Bolex for mattes
>>>> while running it slowly with an animation motor.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing listFrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.comhttps://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks at jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/pipermail/frameworks/attachments/20160228/e9bce7de/attachment.html>