[Frameworks] tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push?

Raymond Beluga Studio aktivfilm at gmail.com
Mon Sep 27 21:03:13 UTC 2021


Hello Moira,

If you suspect the low-light footage is underexposed, I would definitely
push the film as Pip suggests, EXCEPT for those (mixed) rolls with daylight
footage, for in that case you would be pushing that footage as well, which
would turn out overexposed.

Cheers,
r.

On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 14:01, <frameworks-request at film-gallery.org> wrote:

> Send Frameworks mailing list submissions to
>         frameworks at film-gallery.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         frameworks-request at film-gallery.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         frameworks-owner at film-gallery.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Frameworks digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Phytography book (Karel Doing)
>    2. tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push? (ev petrol)
>    3. Re: tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push? (FrameWorks Admin)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Karel Doing <mail at kareldoing.net>
> To: frameworks at film-gallery.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:43:00 +0000
> Subject: [Frameworks] Phytography book
> This is an update for all of you who are interested in phytography, a
> method that taps into the ability of plants to render their own image on
> photographic emulsion. This method was developed by Karel Doing and has
> inspired many filmmakers and  photographers to work with this simple, yet
> versatile and multipurpose technique. The book will unite 11 experimental
> filmmakers and photographers who have worked intensively with phytography.
> The book will be handmade at the London Centre for Book Arts and will be
> printed in a limited edition of 100 copies. You can pre-order the book and
> support the project by choosing one of the perks such as online workshops,
> original phytographic prints and more. Books are selling fast, get your
> copy today!
>
> For more information please follow the link:
> https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/phytography-book#/
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ev petrol <epetrol2 at yahoo.com>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at film-gallery.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: [Frameworks] tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push?
> Hey folks,
>
> I just shot a gig on Tri-X Super 8 - very low light, my meter needle was
> hovering between f 1.4 & being in the red. A friend with a lightmeter
> checked the levels for me & it seems like I might have been just about ok,
> but I'm  concerned about the image being underexposed.
>
> Some of the rolls also have daylight footage on them, of the musicians
> soundchecking - the meter needle was in or around f 5.6 for those shots.
>
> I'm wondering whether I should ask the lab to push one stop - any thoughts?
>
> We're going to do a 2K scan of the developed footage, for digital edit.
>
> cheers Moira
>
>
> moiratierney.net
> vimeo.com/moiratierney
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: FrameWorks Admin <frameworks at re-voir.com>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at film-gallery.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 23:49:09 +0900
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push?
> Hey Moira,
> Since you are editing in digital, why not develop it as a negative? In
> that case it should be 400ASA instead of 200, so you gain a stop.
> - Pip
>
>
> On Sep 27, 2021, at 11:24 PM, ev petrol <epetrol2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I just shot a gig on Tri-X Super 8 - very low light, my meter needle was
> hovering between f 1.4 & being in the red. A friend with a lightmeter
> checked the levels for me & it seems like I might have been just about ok,
> but I'm  concerned about the image being underexposed.
>
> Some of the rolls also have daylight footage on them, of the musicians
> soundchecking - the meter needle was in or around f 5.6 for those shots.
>
> I'm wondering whether I should ask the lab to push one stop - any thoughts?
>
> We're going to do a 2K scan of the developed footage, for digital edit.
>
>
> --
> Frameworks mailing list
> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>


-- 
ruben guzman
raymond beluga studio
www.raymondbelugastudio.com
https://vimeo.com/user10836118
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://film-gallery.org/pipermail/frameworks_film-gallery.org/attachments/20210927/9bf59314/attachment.html>


More information about the Frameworks mailing list