[Frameworks] tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push?

[ev petrol]

Thanks Raymond! 
that's my dilemma, I didn't keep track of which rolls had the daylight footage (didn't think of the push option till after I'd shot them all) & a good few of them are mixed daylight / nighttime ,,,



moiratierney.net vimeo.com/moiratierney 

    On Monday, September 27, 2021, 10:04:53 PM GMT+1, Raymond Beluga Studio <aktivfilm at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Hello Moira,
If you suspect the low-light footage is underexposed, I would definitely push the film as Pip suggests, EXCEPT for those (mixed) rolls with daylight footage, for in that case you would be pushing that footage as well, which would turn out overexposed.
Cheers,r.

On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 14:01, <frameworks-request at film-gallery.org> wrote:

Send Frameworks mailing list submissions to
        frameworks at film-gallery.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        frameworks-request at film-gallery.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        frameworks-owner at film-gallery.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Frameworks digest..."
Today's Topics:

   1. Phytography book (Karel Doing)
   2. tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push? (ev petrol)
   3. Re: tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push? (FrameWorks Admin)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Karel Doing <mail at kareldoing.net>
To: frameworks at film-gallery.org
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:43:00 +0000
Subject: [Frameworks] Phytography book
 This is an update for all of you who are interested in phytography, a method that taps into the ability of plants to render their own image on photographic emulsion. This method was developed by Karel Doing and has inspired many filmmakers and  photographers to work with this simple, yet versatile and multipurpose technique. The book will unite 11 experimental filmmakers and photographers who have worked intensively with phytography. The book will be handmade at the London Centre for Book Arts and will be printed in a limited edition of 100 copies. You can pre-order the book and support the project by choosing one of the perks such as online workshops, original phytographic prints and more. Books are selling fast, get your copy today!
For more information please follow the link:https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/phytography-book#/
 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ev petrol <epetrol2 at yahoo.com>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at film-gallery.org>
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Frameworks] tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push?
Hey folks,
I just shot a gig on Tri-X Super 8 - very low light, my meter needle was hovering between f 1.4 & being in the red. A friend with a lightmeter checked the levels for me & it seems like I might have been just about ok, but I'm  concerned about the image being underexposed.
Some of the rolls also have daylight footage on them, of the musicians soundchecking - the meter needle was in or around f 5.6 for those shots.
I'm wondering whether I should ask the lab to push one stop - any thoughts?
We're going to do a 2K scan of the developed footage, for digital edit.

cheers Moira


moiratierney.net 
vimeo.com/moiratierney
  


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: FrameWorks Admin <frameworks at re-voir.com>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <frameworks at film-gallery.org>
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 23:49:09 +0900
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] tri-x (super 8) - to push or not to push?
Hey Moira,Since you are editing in digital, why not develop it as a negative? In that case it should be 400ASA instead of 200, so you gain a stop. - Pip


On Sep 27, 2021, at 11:24 PM, ev petrol <epetrol2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey folks,
I just shot a gig on Tri-X Super 8 - very low light, my meter needle was hovering between f 1.4 & being in the red. A friend with a lightmeter checked the levels for me & it seems like I might have been just about ok, but I'm  concerned about the image being underexposed.
Some of the rolls also have daylight footage on them, of the musicians soundchecking - the meter needle was in or around f 5.6 for those shots.
I'm wondering whether I should ask the lab to push one stop - any thoughts?
We're going to do a 2K scan of the developed footage, for digital edit.


-- 
Frameworks mailing list
Frameworks at film-gallery.org
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org



-- 
ruben guzman
raymond beluga studio
www.raymondbelugastudio.com
https://vimeo.com/user10836118
-- 
Frameworks mailing list
Frameworks at film-gallery.org
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://film-gallery.org/pipermail/frameworks_film-gallery.org/attachments/20210927/e2a59afa/attachment.html>