[Frameworks] Aaton camera?

Francisco Torres fjtorrespr at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 09:46:34 CST 2025


Well, I did say the krasnos are grungy.... Myself I always preferred B/,H
filmo

On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, 2:16 AM Eric Theise <erictheise at gmail.com> wrote:

> [image: image.png]
>
> Curious that a Hyperallergic article posted the same day as Sue's original
> opens with a 1987 photo of Ben Caldwell straddling some not-smaller Aaton.
>
>
> https://hyperallergic.com/993238/a-collective-portrait-of-black-los-angeles-told-through-artist-ben-caldwell/
>
> https://www.towson.edu/cofac/departments/mediafilm/resources/documents/aaton--ltr-16mm-usermanual.pdf
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 11:18 PM Dave Tetzlaff <djtet53 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As much as it costs now to buy, process and workprint-or-scan a 100 ft
>> load of 16mm film, putting it in a Krasno is insane. Plus, unless you've
>> been doing wrist-arm-shoulder workouts diligently you'll likely need to
>> budget for medical bills and/or physical therapy to deal with the aftermath
>> of trying to wind the spring a few times.
>>
>> The going eBay prices of 16mm MOS cameras other than Bolex that are
>> actually usable can swing wildly over time. Maybe 18 years ago you could
>> get Kodak K100s for like $150-200, but I have no idea what's out there now.
>>
>> But... There's no point trying to address the question of the OP given
>> that anyone who asks if film is still available for an A-Minima likely
>> needs way more basic help than getting camera advice from the list (maybe
>> like reading through Lipton first?). And there's no way we can offer
>> anything like cogent advice unless we know what she want's to shoot, what
>> type of end product she might hope to create from it, and why oh why she
>> imagines doing this in 16mm instead of some form of digital, since the
>> options are so wide, lots of them are smaller and lighter than an an Aaton,
>> and memory cards are sure smaller and lighter than rolls of 16mm stock.
>>
>> IOW, the reason to NOT use video (assuming there is one) in 2025 likely
>> indicates the proper path inside the photochemical film realm.
>>
>>>
>>> --
>> Frameworks mailing list
>> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>>
> --
> Frameworks mailing list
> Frameworks at film-gallery.org
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://film-gallery.org/pipermail/frameworks_film-gallery.org/attachments/20250304/de08ca37/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 776730 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://film-gallery.org/pipermail/frameworks_film-gallery.org/attachments/20250304/de08ca37/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Frameworks mailing list